Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 May 2014 17:50:05 +0400
From:      Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Allowing CARP to use arbitrary OUI prefix and allocating block from FreeBSD's OUI space assignment for that
Message-ID:  <0rxH4JJknMOY34ungRbP4jrPfLM@dHhGgwofm7uNfL6/X5%2BbGIkDUYs>
In-Reply-To: <jFzRD2Y/x/4vgSDdS1CPQw/Hudo@dHhGgwofm7uNfL6/X5%2BbGIkDUYs>
References:  <Nlrr646yWAdJ7EfNj9z5ymwq5ZQ@dHhGgwofm7uNfL6/X5%2BbGIkDUYs> <97B3C7CB-3E64-4FE0-81C8-F1FE6FB456A2@lists.zabbadoz.net> <ht5ioSVMkYjTNaadctX3apO0nWQ@dHhGgwofm7uNfL6/X5%2BbGIkDUYs> <1B71A1AC-8A85-415D-A413-CD01635B3123@lists.zabbadoz.net> <jFzRD2Y/x/4vgSDdS1CPQw/Hudo@dHhGgwofm7uNfL6/X5%2BbGIkDUYs>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:32:28PM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:08:28PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > People need to talk.   The fact that your server guys use a
> > non-unique Ethernet address for CARP without talking to their local
> > authority who’s in charge of the network first is nothing you can
> > fix changing the number.   The fact that multiple deployments on the
> > same subnet might exist is nothing a number change will fix.   I
> > think the RFC uses the word “coordinate”.
> 
> People need to talk, yes.  But do BGP heads will announce the
> technical details of what they are doing to the Squid cluster guys
> (picking protocol and software names arbitrary)?  Not sure.  Hell,
> I am sure they won't.
> 
> And if we speak about RFCs: we need protocol specifications at all not
> only because people should know how they work, but also to avoid
> messing (perhaps unintentionally) some technical details of the
> protocols making different ones to bring havoc if used together.
> 
> That's why VRRP for IPv6 has its own OUI space and that's why CARP
> needs its own OUI space: it is a different protocol from VRRP, so we
> should minimize clashes at all levels.  IANA/IETF could have said "oh
> dear, L2 domain admins must coordinate their IPv4 and IPv6 VRRP
> things, so let's reuse 00-00-5E-00-01 space".  But they minimised
> confusion where they could and that's a good thing to do.

By the way,
  http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=139955603603070&w=2
So the new OUI assignment is already in place, it will be interesting
what will be done next and if this patch will be accepted by OpenBSD.
-- 
Eygene Ryabinkin                                        ,,,^..^,,,
[ Life's unfair - but root password helps!           | codelabs.ru ]
[ 82FE 06BC D497 C0DE 49EC  4FF0 16AF 9EAE 8152 ECFB | freebsd.org ]

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)

iL4EABEKAGYFAlNri41fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDgyRkUwNkJDRDQ5N0MwREU0OUVDNEZGMDE2
QUY5RUFFODE1MkVDRkIACgkQFq+eroFS7PtOTgD/QCrLDTft14DmjabRKzpoYbP5
KLtrYvbewu+E0BwtKucA/Agqmiy6poj2A8aiD7MuL2ZET5SauKqePc+SfdqMwkL6
=s6+x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0rxH4JJknMOY34ungRbP4jrPfLM>