Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:47:29 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Segmentation fault running ntpd Message-ID: <56333CB1.5050003@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5C3532DB-CFD2-4C30-8854-9C9E883D5148@lastsummer.de> References: <20150718120956.GC1155@albert.catwhisker.org> <86pozwbvds.fsf@desk.des.no> <FDD0A8E1-C812-4C65-8047-CC48106128F1@gmail.com> <86lhakbua7.fsf@desk.des.no> <F24CF26E-85AE-4FC0-A8B9-6BB929B805ED@gmail.com> <9D306406-691B-491E-8933-D991A09620A3@lastsummer.de> <B5598D1A-04D2-4488-8885-5D9A2D2D92ED@gmail.com> <5C3532DB-CFD2-4C30-8854-9C9E883D5148@lastsummer.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --cN8TTx5bwmB7Hu1kqwihcCiMdVSCihTct Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/30/15 09:32, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Well, it=E2=80=99s on stable/10 since September 16 and somebody reporte= d that > this particular branch would not trigger the crash along with HEAD, > but any 10.x would. Can=E2=80=99t find the reference right now though.= That was me, amongst others. There are threads on security@ and question= s@. >> On 30 Oct 2015, at 10:24 am, NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote= : >> >> >>> On Oct 30, 2015, at 02:18, Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de> wro= te: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I did a quick test build and this seems to solve the ntpd crash issue= >>> on top of releng/10.1. >> >> Makes sense =E2=80=A6 looking through my email r287591 was never MFCed= back to stable/9 or stable/10 :/ . >> HTH, >> -NGie There were two problems reported: 1) ntpdc and ntpq would crash -- this was reported for 9.3-STABLE -- I don't think it affected other releases, and was diagnosed as due to a pthreads linking issue. Solved for 9.x in r290044 and r290046 2) ntpd SEGV's on startup on 10.2-RELEASE-p6 (possibly others). Curiously, so does net/ntp from ports, but only on the second startup. Exactly the same ntp package seems to run and restart just fine on recent 10-STABLE though. As does the base system ntpd. Cheers, Matthew =09 --cN8TTx5bwmB7Hu1kqwihcCiMdVSCihTct Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWMzy6AAoJEABRPxDgqeTn5poQAJ/JUSKykxkH2R2rkJHy1O7A bvroxyu+Yd5pxbRJkZMYkHtFu78mTS1Md8Onzs5VnYycpC9o9Jnql9fqahUfamn5 VvGhRFdisjaKADI8ztbnRVSSZJTMvxo7lBcDnsQRXgqa8Ky9zk2I1oPvEisnU8EK LAARfhg6dujgZTlCwpAyghBFthEwVFcCYMlPJll6LNsceIwuCB5IFssOBnvAwFUw WEpp2t9yYLspPN0gD8m+HeHrz5j4Y3BPK7Vh8rAY1ue9vdkBHN0doYN78xqS4cEl c0xjhf1CdDeuUGjYG3fuPwV84rwf9fvjB5oWfnZblW0RH+R3SmynghzSRHKbaOWJ uXV1IkHJScu3YayY9DTI3vRRz4sAGFm0Z4iQkh+9Qf97qPo0qxncPdHK1pR+H0Cd q9GJIn3szZ/wcrB/Aud4hTLVQ5WiWigmKEhbDAwknHqfuhOQsgwSOvejV2SemJRk VWnold1tjFefMgl7/riaWwJPB4XWRvaR8GtbaMpUsxBwwJmKuIm+nv1/r/Ug/ZWW nj6fXbeozI4ltkY5omQM+sKLfwQmOaT/LGZuV9Jm/CBxm42x3Z8oILzw2SNeWjhP F1Ls50y9sGMu0XFHDVdj1HiSOx1iG5PjOmSUZDmzSvtgTKBVYtgB3YLjxl50aZzS 6Qp365i7GFnE1zDRJLp3 =93pR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cN8TTx5bwmB7Hu1kqwihcCiMdVSCihTct--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56333CB1.5050003>