Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Sep 1996 17:23:39 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        deraadt@theos.com (Theo de Raadt)
Cc:        nate@mt.sri.com, terry@lambert.org, dg@root.com, darrend@novell.com, chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux 96 (my impressions) - Reply
Message-ID:  <199609050023.RAA07677@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <9609042100.AA12246@theos.com> from "Theo de Raadt" at Sep 4, 96 03:00:38 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> BTW, Terry, nasty modstat bug :)
> 

The LKM package was never released as anything but beta.  The modstat
were added by CGD to allow non-root users to display the loaded modules.
In my initial release, the device was accessable to root only, and none
of the commands rand suid.

Or do you mean the fact that NetBSD didn't strip out the commented-out
Sun copyright manual pages from the source files before distributing
them?  8-).  I wrote the things from the Sun man pages to make them act
like the man page said the SunOS 4.1.3_U1 commands operated.

The whole LKM package was a rush job for the modular console design
that got adulterated, and then was never implemented.  Because I rushed
the LKM's, I came in the first Monday of June 1994 and found that USL
would not let me distribute my shared library code.  I expect it set the
whole shared library effort back a year or more.  Stinking module code.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609050023.RAA07677>