Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:36:10 +1030 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org>, FreeBSD Java <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Are syscall wrappers needed in JNI? Message-ID: <20010302183610.A69992@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <05bd01c0a2e9$a1b669e0$0e05a8c0@coffee>; from ari@suutari.iki.fi on Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 09:23:07AM %2B0200 References: <3A9AE85F.C6F06D96@vangelderen.org><15002.60084.89087.467979@nomad.yogotech.com><3A9EF71F.A13189C6@vangelderen.org> <15006.63617.145790.5705@nomad.yogotech.com> <05bd01c0a2e9$a1b669e0$0e05a8c0@coffee>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 09:23:07AM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: > > Interesting enough, from my memory, select is wrapped in the JVM, but > > poll was not. > > > I was talking about jdk1.2.2. For the version I was starting to use > commapi, select was not wrapped, but poll was. You can even find > discussion about this on freebsd-java mailing list, I think. If I > remember > correctly the reason for select not being wrapped was that JVM was > internally using poll and thus patchers assumed that there was not need > to wrap select. Ari is correct. select() isn't wrapped in patchset 10. However, it is wrapped again in the current repository version. It was wrapped in some patchsets too. So Nate is also correct :). -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Mobile: 0419 868 494 Information Technology Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010302183610.A69992>