Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:50:20 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? Message-ID: <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <46928623@ipt.ru> References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090725115525.GA85767@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725123749.GA26505@abigail.blackend.org> <46928623@ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/QTTM/tAnfFU2Bwu.jR0.zoi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0400 Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote: >=20 > As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very > helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both > linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better > then flashplugin[7|9]. >=20 It does not work very well under Linux32 compat on -current - our futex implementation seems to be too broken and causes frequent deadlock and causes multiple threads to get stuck on process exit. One can easily collect dozens of those stuck processes doing causal web browsing. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/QTTM/tAnfFU2Bwu.jR0.zoi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFKaxuyQ6z1jMm+XZYRAt6sAJ47Glr60hpf9+dgQXSXSpws6JzO3wCffw4H mEAymedvzSpoZdW0N1QXFQY= =5AYF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/QTTM/tAnfFU2Bwu.jR0.zoi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090725105020.66e281ee>