Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 16:32:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> Cc: noor@comrax.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Latest RELENG_4. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007171632360.71982-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200007172325.QAA16817@freeway.dcfinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> As I recall, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> >
> >> As I recall, noor@comrax.com wrote:
> >>> What is the latest FreeBSD-STABLE release, and is it stable enough
> >>> for a productional system?
> >>
> >> Please remember that "STABLE" refers to the stability of the source
> >> tree, not of the resulting running system. That is, you should not
> >> see developmental work going on in -STABLE.
> >
> > Well, I claim this to be false: the targetted stability *is* of the
> > resulting product. Of course, we sometimes make mistakes - but if you
> > have *any* stability problems you should tell us!!
>
> Note that I didn't claim the -STABLE systems weren't stable. I just
> said that the original questioner seemed to have misunderstood the
> meaning of the tag.
And I was claiming the same about you :-)
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007171632360.71982-100000>