Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:50:43 +1030 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New malloc ready, take 42 Message-ID: <43B3722B.5070809@obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <2E722A13-C880-41B6-A84C-3927C8FE90E5@freebsd.org> References: <E1E22E2D-A6D5-49CC-9649-C37C50F0443B@freebsd.org> <43B36B83.7080404@freebsd.org> <32729773-B07C-4AEE-92D0-62ACE0E3AFEB@freebsd.org> <43B36EB9.70205@freebsd.org> <2E722A13-C880-41B6-A84C-3927C8FE90E5@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jason Evans wrote: > On Dec 28, 2005, at 9:06 PM, David Xu wrote: > >> >> I am using patch file jemalloc_20051222c.diff. I don't use >> MALLOC_OPTIONS and don't create link malloc.conf in /etc. >> I have tested super-smack with following command: >> >> %super-smack ./select-key.smack 10 5000 >> Query Barrel Report for client smacker1 >> connect: max=4ms min=1ms avg= 2ms from 10 clients >> Query_type num_queries max_time min_time q_per_s >> select_index 100000 0 0 15895.76 > > > Can you please try again with MALLOC_OPTIONS=aj, and (similar to the > tests I ran): > > MALLOC_OPTIONS=aj super-smack ./select-key.smack 4 10000 > > It will be helpful to know whether your hardware behaves differently > for the same test. Also, I don't have any working hardware right > now, so I can't try to reproduce your results. > > Thanks, > Jason > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > It's better to make the /etc/malloc.conf -> aj link instead of using the env variable, otherwise it's easy to forget to restart the mysqld with the new malloc options. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43B3722B.5070809>