Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 06:29:33 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Do we want to let cpp(1) hide warnings in system headers? Message-ID: <20030331032933.GA60867@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20030330220720.GB20921@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030313180854.GB47492@sunbay.com> <20030329231905.GA44034@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030330060918.GB43829@sunbay.com> <20030330220720.GB20921@dragon.nuxi.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 02:07:20PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 09:09:18AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 03:19:05PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:08:54PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > Sigh. It's been a while since I've fixed the "feature" of gcc(1) > > > > that makes it hide warnings in system headers (but visible with > > > > -nostdinc -I/usr/include). > > > > > > What is the difference in output from "make buildworld"? > > > > > Lot of (non-fatal) warnings. > > I was hoping you'd acutally show some of the increased warning output. > Without this, cpp(1) doesn't warn about redefinitions in system headers, that's how I hit this bug. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+h7YdUkv4P6juNwoRAg9IAJ96p8Gu2eEmiOudXYKTrwQP5WOzxgCdHwIl E3LLi0bPW4i2mhX5sSipGKc= =+UgU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030331032933.GA60867>