Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 23 Oct 2018 08:30:09 -0700
From:      Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org>
Cc:        Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: which way to update export_args structure?
Message-ID:  <5BE9C124-9EA0-4B5D-BE0F-7A1F6C727250@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1540226963.490541.1550623304.5D6A95A6@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <YTOPR0101MB182021549F8CF8277477A4C5DDE90@YTOPR0101MB1820.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20181003155133.GA57729@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <YTOPR0101MB18207FF98DED0232B9BB1B4FDDE50@YTOPR0101MB1820.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20181008170428.GB9766@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <YTOPR0101MB11626B32F73B520FBDA3C633DDFA0@YTOPR0101MB1162.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20181022160508.GB45769@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <1540226963.490541.1550623304.5D6A95A6@webmail.messagingengine.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


> On Oct 22, 2018, at 09:49, Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> This is the direction I'd been thinking.  FWIW, the usecase is more that
>> once you've moved away from the struct it's easy to make incremental
>> changes then to use a 32-bit mountd on a 64-bit kernel.  Moving toward
>> size-independent interfaces helps both causes though.
>> 
>> -- Brooks
>> Email had 1 attachment:
>> + signature.asc
>>  1k (application/pgp-signature)
> 
> 
> Brooks,
> 
> What is the benefit or usecase for running a 32 bit mountd on a 64 bit kernel?

There generally isn’t a case for doing this, but running a 32-bit mountd in a 32-bit chroot can allow someone with a working 32-bit environment at a company (for instance) to rebuild environments which rely on NFS mounts and the like.

This is an esoteric usecase, but I’ve seen it used before (and I’ve used it myself ;)..).

I don’t think this niche usecase should hinder forward progress in terms of modernizing the base OS though. Biarch usecases are diminishing over time.

-Enji

help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5BE9C124-9EA0-4B5D-BE0F-7A1F6C727250>