Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 08:37:08 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2@yahoo.com> To: dieterbsd@engineer.com, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs Message-ID: <358296.9804.qm@web110501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <8CD7CE2D452BCC8-12E0-15406@web-mmc-d01.sysops.aol.com> References: <8CD7CE2D452BCC8-12E0-15406@web-mmc-d01.sysops.aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm sorry. I didn't run it. I should have but a journal was required. I could have used FFS w GEOM Journal but I was winging this in my free time while performing my "job". (Bored easily, and easily interested when something just "feels" wrong) So, I went with ZFS due to the gobs of memory on the machine. Paul ________________________________ From: "dieterbsd@engineer.com" <dieterbsd@engineer.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Sent: Fri, January 7, 2011 7:33:39 PM Subject: Re: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs Paul: > EXT3 - ~3000 tps > EXT4 - ~3800 tps > XFS - ~ 1800 tps > ZFS - 75000 tps The result for FFS w/softdeps seems to have been lost in the mail. :-( Mark: > They certainly have earned the title Moronix either way. For me, getting a debugging flag wrong (assuming they did, there seems to be some question) pales in comparison with "my adventure to the Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster Site". There's a reason I think of linux types as bird brains, and it isn't just because of Tux. _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?358296.9804.qm>