Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 01:41:21 +0100 From: Lewis Thompson <purple@lewiz.net> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam_krb5 port question Message-ID: <20030909004121.GA782@lewiz.org> In-Reply-To: <3F5D0BA5.8040003@ciam.ru> References: <20030908151226.98548.qmail@web40701.mail.yahoo.com> <3F5D0BA5.8040003@ciam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:07:17AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Jon Passki wrote: > >Is there any reason why the port is mainly focused for MIT Kerberos > >and not Heimdal? >=20 > KRB5_IMPL=3Dheimdail didn't help? If so, it'll be great if you fix this= =20 > and send a patch to the port maintainer. I'm personally not skilled enough to do it (well, not skilled... I just wouldn't know how) but I'd really like to see this use the Heimdal Kerberos provided in the base system. -lewiz. --=20 I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -| msn:purple@lewiz.net | jab:lewiz@jabber.org | url:http://lewiz.net |- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/XSGxItq0KFQv7T8RAuJ+AKDC7zPJ4maaPO+jwIc811f2EZ9s0gCfZICk KLxNLQGC0HCZtiThnjVSca4= =ITdj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030909004121.GA782>