Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:25:12 +0100 (BST) From: <n_hibma@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com> Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: hid_report_size() prototype wrong in both -stable and -current Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104181024480.92561-100000@henny.webweaving.org> In-Reply-To: <1087.207.5.33.65.987532780.squirrel@medusa.kfu.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Concidental. The code that is in libusb is also present in the kernel. Nick On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Nick Sayer wrote: > > > > usb.h != libusb.h > > > > NetBSD has a stupid naming convention. Use libusb.h in FreeBSD. > > Ok. That's as may be, but then why are there prototypes for libusb calls in > dev/usb.h? > > > > > The prototypes are correct as is. > > They may be in libusb.h, but the prototype for that function in > sys/dev/usb.h is mysterious. > > -- The USB for FreeBSD project. n_hibma@FreeBSD.ORG http://www.etla.net/~n_hibma/usb/usb.pl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0104181024480.92561-100000>