Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:26:03 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@FreeBSD.org>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/unzip Makefile unzip.1 unzip.c Message-ID: <478BC55B.2060202@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080114181154.GA2286@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200801080800.m08806jI012963@repoman.freebsd.org> <478A8FFE.8080602@freebsd.org> <478A95F2.1070709@FreeBSD.org> <478AA9E4.2010807@kientzle.com> <478ABC4B.8080601@FreeBSD.org> <20080114181154.GA2286@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote: >> If we have to special case ports to deal with variant zipfiles that cannot >> be processed by /usr/bin/unzip then it gets messier because we have to >> account for some ports being satisfied with USE_ZIP=yes meaning >> /usr/bin/unzip and some still requiring /usr/ports/archivers/unzip. I'd >> prefer not to have to add those workarounds. > > This seems quite easy... > > For those four-ish ports 's/USE_ZIP/USE_INFOZIP/' That's what I meant by "special case". I don't like adding special case variables to bsd.*.mk for the benefit of a tiny number of ports; that file is already cluttered enough. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?478BC55B.2060202>