Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:57:39 +0100
From:      Kai Gallasch <k@free.de>
To:        freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pkg snapshot and pkg rollback functionality
Message-ID:  <82830994-D9FC-40A4-8160-6D4AD6D12266@free.de>
In-Reply-To: <5306646F.5020800@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <95F734F1-21C5-4DAC-ADC2-AF730B115237@free.de> <906302436.50659.1392895155006.JavaMail.sas1@[172.29.252.247]> <5306646F.5020800@infracaninophile.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Am 20.02.2014 um 21:24 schrieb Matthew Seaman:
> On 20/02/2014 11:19, kaltheat wrote:
>> 
>> ---- On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:52:41 +0100 Kai Gallasch<k@free.de> wrote ---- 
>> 
>> ...
>>> I think such a snapshot/rollback option for pkg would be very beneficial, because it would give you the option to "roll back" your pkg to every former frozen state in an orderly manner. Even after you find out a week later that doing an upgrade was not such a splendig idea. 
>>> 
>>> What do you think? 
>>> 
>>> K. 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I think this is a good idea making life of administrators much easier.
>> I think it would be best if you create a "feature request" on github[1] to avoid
>> that this idea will pass out of mind.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> kaltheat
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/
> 
> This one already exists and has been in our issues list for quite some
> time...
> 
> 	Cheers,
> 
> 	Matthew



Matthew, so you are referring to https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/311 ?
It's the only open feature request I found, that comes close to what I am proposing.

BTW:
I wonder why development of a FreeBSD core element like pkg takes place outside the FreeBSD repo environment, where a possible committer must sign up for some account.. Shouldn't the FreeBSD development be self contained on its own infrastructure? I know github is very convenient and easy on the eyes - I see that and no offense intended here for choosing github or prefering a modern SCM tool like mercurial, git or whatever over svn. Maybe it's not really a problem for the majority and I - as a fossil - suffer from oldthink. Just some metathoughts.

Cheers!
K.

--
GPG-Key: A593 E38B E968 4DBE 14D6  2115 7065 4D7C 4FB1 F588
Key available from hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=pOWQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?82830994-D9FC-40A4-8160-6D4AD6D12266>