Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 11:32:15 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Alie Tan <alie@affle.com> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Changing the default ABI to EABI Message-ID: <94777EB9-FA09-4D6D-A8DA-361CFE028C7C@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CANuCnH86tZyT7qZRb6Rcj7CQk_SXS=-zqo04uCbXHW6kDM9nwg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20130702211103.332e8854@bender.Home> <7BBCF927-7619-462E-9E4F-9F3172746BE5@bsdimp.com> <20130704085856.6d024927@bender.Home> <CANuCnH86tZyT7qZRb6Rcj7CQk_SXS=-zqo04uCbXHW6kDM9nwg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 4, 2013, at 2:54 AM, Alie Tan wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> = wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:33:23 -0600 > Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >=20 > > On Jul 2, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Andrew Turner wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm planning on changing the default ARM ABI to the ARM EABI. I > > > believe all the known issues have been fixed, however I would like > > > to know if there are any outstanding problems. > > > > Cool! > > > > Does the in-tree gcc support this? What happens if you turn off = clang > > and try to do this? >=20 > It should, however I have not used it in a number of months. > It works. Btw FYI VFP is not compiling for GCC=20 OK. thanks. Guess that means that we don't need to have some kind of = safety interlock for that... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?94777EB9-FA09-4D6D-A8DA-361CFE028C7C>