Date: 28 May 2002 05:54:36 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> Cc: audit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: %j for printf(9) Message-ID: <xzpadql6i6b.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020528001615.4BAC93E5E@turbine.trit.org> References: <20020528001615.4BAC93E5E@turbine.trit.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org> writes:
> I still like my restructure, but since other people don't seem to
> share my opinion, I'm fine doing it another (your) way. That said, I
> think your patch has some bugs that mine doesn't. For example, this:
>
> printf("%ld\n", -4);
>
> yields "4294967292" with your patch, but not with mine (mine, and
> printf(3), yield "-4"). I think the attached patch (relative to
> subr_prf.c *with* your patch applied) fixes it.
Yep. Commit?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpadql6i6b.fsf>