Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 07:59:24 +0000 From: Matt Churchyard <matt.churchyard@userve.net> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Vale port naming Message-ID: <22d076ee848941ffaa6769019d278bbb@SERVER.ad.usd-group.com> In-Reply-To: <20160404223941.GB25187@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <a019e4d9df0648e4affdc2dfa62595d9@SERVER.ad.usd-group.com> <20160404223748.GA25187@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20160404223941.GB25187@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:37:48PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:29:31AM +0000, Matt Churchyard via freebsd-n= et wrote: > > > From the little information I can find on the net it seems that valeX= :Y is the format for a port on a vale switch. > > > Some examples use vale0:1, others use a letter such as valeA:0. The o= nly details I can find is a vague reference to a 15/16? character limit, > > > although I don't know whether that applies to just the first part of= the whole thing. > >=20 > > Can anyone clarify the valid format for a vale switch/port? > > Is there any length or character restriction on X & Y? >=20 > According to the vale.4 manpage: >=20 > vale ports are named vale[bdg:][port] where vale is the prefix > indicating a VALE switch rather than a standard interface, bdg > indicates a specific switch (the colon is a separator), and port > indicates a port within the switch. Bridge and port names are > arbitrary strings, the only constraint being that the full name > must fit within 16 characters. >=20 > The manpage is confusing in that the name must be 15 characters plus=20 > the NUL character. Given the other limits, it looks like bdg can be=20 > up to 8 characters in practice. > Having hit send, I've noticed I'm wrong here. :) In fact, you have 10 c= haracters to split betwen bdg and port. > -- Brooks Ok, so I can assume using port names like "vale9d9af:66aa9" isn't the reaso= n that my test machine is panicing. I might give 10.3 a go instead of head and see how I get on with that. Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22d076ee848941ffaa6769019d278bbb>