Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:28:25 -0400
From:      "Jeff Love" <jl@burghcom.com>
To:        <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore?
Message-ID:  <00c801c0f36d$77c5a400$f5a072d1@hq.sgi.net>
References:  <Pine.A41.3.96.1010612000229.84080E-100000@gsaix2.cc.GaSoU.EDU>	<3B25CAEC.27AF9D30@cisco.com> <a0zobdeq46.fsf@panix6.panix.com> <3B265CE9.516AFB04@cisco.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> Yeah, CVSup's ability to maintain a local repository.  With this
> methodology, instead of using CVSup to keep /usr/{ports,src} up to date
> one keeps their local repo up to date and then uses cvs to checkout
> directly from there.

If you've done a cvs upgrade to OpenBSD, that's how it works.

Jeff Love
Burgh-Com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00c801c0f36d$77c5a400$f5a072d1>