Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:03:40 +0900 (JST) From: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: Pavel@Janik.cz Cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [porting-dev] Towards OpenOffice.org ports for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE Message-ID: <20031128.210340.607957348.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <m37k1lo6ix.fsf@Janik.cz> References: <m3y8u4l4vg.fsf@Janik.cz> <20031127.223434.846935079.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <m37k1lo6ix.fsf@Janik.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Pavel, > From: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> > Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) > > > `it works for me, and I'm 99% sure that this port will work for > > No one can tell that surely. Do you know exactly where the fundamental So, I told 99%. > problem with linking is? It can be hidden anywhere and you will risk users' > satisfaction. For FreeBSD, it is still hard to say OOo has productivity quality. I read your IZ, different specification of dlopen, might affect everywhere in OOo. For FreeBSD, we need more developers. absolutely. and also I want to draw FreeBSD hackers attentions. there are huge number of Linux hackers, but still the numbers of *BSD related person are extemely few... --maho
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031128.210340.607957348.chat95>