Date: 21 Dec 2000 20:37:36 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: J Bacher <jb@jbacher.com> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dsniff 2.3 info: Message-ID: <xzpzohpd0qn.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: J Bacher's message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:40:29 -0600" References: <Roger Marquis's message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 08:23:37 -0800 (PST)"> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012210758270.70602-100000@roble.com> <4.2.2.20001221111451.00b6ef00@mail.jbacher.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
J Bacher <jb@jbacher.com> writes: > At 05:28 PM 12/21/00 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > This is the result of some incorrect assumptions on the part of > > > the ports maintainers and a lack of port standards or enforcement > > > in general. > > Which translates to "it's FreeBSD's fault". Send patches or shut up. > So, are you in agreement that this is a FreeBSD issue? Not necessarily. I'm saying that what you write translates to laying the blame at the FreeBSD project's feet. > If so, do you expect that anyone that reports a problem with an OS or > application should also be the individual to provide patches? You're not "reporting a problem", you're saying that the problem being discussed is caused by incompetence or sloppyiness on the part of the members of the FreeBSD project. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzohpd0qn.fsf>