Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 22:20:38 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: "Sean J. Schluntz" <schluntz@pacbell.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux LKM Emulation Question Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971217221814.6793B-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199712180525.VAA17675@mail-gw.pacbell.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Once the LKM is loaded. itis *ALMOST* identical.. the difference is: the init routine is called from a different place and the virtual addresses of the routines are slightly different. Functionally they are identical. On Wed, 17 Dec 1997, Sean J. Schluntz wrote: > I have a question about the speed difference between the Linux LKM and > the kernel option for Linux. > > I'm going to be running at least one program a lot on my system that is a > Linux program (Executor the Mac emulator) and I have 64megs of RAM. Will > I seen any speed increase by building Linux in to the FreeBSD kernel > (v2.2.5) over using the LKM, or should I stick with the LKM? > > Thanks for your time! > > -Sean > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sean J. Schluntz schluntz@pinpt.com > Systems Engineer (408) 997-6900 x222 > PinPoint Software Corporation http://www.pinpt.com > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971217221814.6793B-100000>