Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Mar 1996 17:54:13 +1000
From:      Stephen McKay <syssgm@devetir.qld.gov.au>
To:        Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, syssgm@devetir.qld.gov.au
Subject:   Re: historical note..
Message-ID:  <199603130754.RAA20124@orion.devetir.qld.gov.au>

index | next in thread | raw e-mail

Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com> wrote:

>So, like "Jonathan M. Bresler" was saying to me just the other day:
>> Julian Elischer wrote:
>> > 
>> > I just found this in the BSD4.3 kernel I'm trying to debug..
>> > it's from vmparam.h..
>> 
>> 	HEY! somebody took this out fo the FreeBSD sources!  not fair.
>> 
>> 	i want it back.  please submit a diff.		;^)
>
>I was curious too.  So I fired off a piece of mail to
>our eternally good buddy Keith.  With all due respect,
>I forward his private mail to me.  He says:
>
>    To:      jdl@jdl.com
>    From:    Keith Bostic
>    Subject: Re: Historical note...
>    Date:    Mon, 11 Mar 1996 15:58:45 EST
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------
>    > [ You don't just happen to know who wrote this, do you? :-)
>    >   But, to be a '81 era comment, it's gotta be more like 4.1,
>    >   (or 2.9?) or earlier, right?  -- jdl ]
>
>    Bill Joy checked in the SCCS delta, presumably he wrote the text.
>    And, yes, this comment disappeared before the 4.2 release, so it's
>    not a 4.3BSD kernel.
>
>    --keith
>
>Oh wow!

For contrast, here is the appropriate bit from 386BSD 0.1 in
/sys/sys.386bsd/i386/include/vmparam.h (yes, I keep some weird old cruft):

/*
 * Just for fun: current memory prices are 4600$ a megabyte on VAX (4/22/81),
 * so we loan each swapped in process memory worth 100$, or just admit
 * that we don't consider it worthwhile and swap it out to disk which costs
 * $30/mb or about $0.75.
 * { wfj 6/16/89: Retail AT memory expansion $800/megabyte, loan of $17
 *   on disk costing $7/mb or $0.18 (in memory still 100:1 in cost!) }
 */
#define SAFERSS		8		/* nominal ``small'' resident set size
					   protected against replacement */

Bill got this from net/2, didn't he?  Net/2 was post-4.3, true?  What I'm
building to is the near-to-impossible suggestion that Keith might be wrong.

Still, that's not my main point.  I find this sort of buried historical
trivia fascinating, and would love to have it re-inserted, together with
a 1996 data point.  That is, of course, if we can find an appropriate bit
of code to attach it to, since SAFERSS no longer exists.

Stephen.


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603130754.RAA20124>