Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:53:11 -0700 (MST) From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: rwatson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] IPX and NWFS to be killed in -current. Message-ID: <20041207.105311.74679218.imp@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: <98421.1102400993@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20041206230309.GN92212@wantadilla.lemis.com> <98421.1102400993@critter.freebsd.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> >Why don't you leave that kind of decision to the people who run the > >project? Your intentions appear to be at variance with those of the > >two members of core who have responded. > > That is a refreshingly easy question to answer: because core has time > and again said that they prefer to act on specific requests. Core has been transitioning to a more proactive role in making these sorts of decisions over the past 9 months or so. This can be seen both in terms of what we're doing as individuals, as well as the things we're talking about in our conference calls. Warnerhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041207.105311.74679218.imp>