Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:47:08 +0000 (UTC) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC Message-ID: <ied8pc$lj8$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> References: <4d08a854.w8rPywliRhHs/MXH%akosela@andykosela.com> <AANLkTind3UU%2BNbJeF6-nKrcZgUV6aEY93cwtWuO1yVFV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=J%2Bw1ev6=x3eUP8nQy6fVWw_cyf=nP=zD8TnOd@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiky7GAJba_T4Ry3T%2BURi-O4uynstjw4TtU04kOx@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> wrote: > They won't be secondary if someone does find a minor bug in the > network stack (regardless who introduced it or if it is even related), > which will probably happen given the attention this will invariably > receive. Here's the first one: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=129245633605693&w=2 (Not a back door, but actually recommended practice at the time, see RFC 2451.) -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ied8pc$lj8$1>