Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:42:01 +0100 From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: puc and sio Message-ID: <1150735321.47111.16.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20060619024759.I13558@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060619024759.I13558@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 02:56 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Dear colelagues, > > playing with puc compatible MOXA card I found that it's rather useless with > contemporary DEFAULT kernel: > > - sio compiled in, puc as module - puc identified, but no sio ports detected, > even when puc.ko is loaded by loader > - sio and puc both loaded as modules - all sio ports detected, but comconsole > cannot be activated > - sio and puc compiled in kernel - all work flawlessly > > Maybe it's time to consider including puc in GENERIC? Yes - this has been brought up a few times before. Another alternative is the patch in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-December/058909.html - but there was at least one objection to it. I'm not convinced the current status quo is acceptable, though. Gavin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1150735321.47111.16.camel>