Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 02:58:46 -0800 (PST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE 2.0 Message-ID: <20070106025829.W586@10.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <200701061855.17104.davidxu@freebsd.org> References: <20070104005625.D1508@10.0.0.1> <459DB871.1050109@freebsd.org> <20070105154450.Y586@10.0.0.1> <200701061855.17104.davidxu@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, David Xu wrote: > On Saturday 06 January 2007 07:46, Jeff Roberson wrote: >> On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, David Xu wrote: >>>> Anyway, thanks for the pointer Xu. I may hack this up and compare it to >>>> ULE's current balancing. >>> >>> Yesterday, I have tested super-smack benchmark on 2-cpu machine, ULE >>> decreased performance about 40%, this might be a regression though. >> >> I just fixed a regression in the load balancer. On my 8way opteron ULE is >> now 22% faster than 4BSD for select-key.smack with 32 threads. This is >> for both KSE and libthr. libthr is of course significantly faster >> overall. I believe I can improve this even more by borrowing some tricks >> from solaris. >> >> Jeff > > I have tried it, but my dual-core Athlon X2 3800+ is locked up under stress > testing. Can you tell me what revision of the file and what tests you were doing? > > David Xu > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070106025829.W586>