Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 09:45:33 +0300 From: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> To: Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Cc: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: d86a98ea7a48 - main - Uses/electronfix.mk: Rework to not require listing supported electron versions Message-ID: <CALH631=9XEQbgMSJ%2Bd6YfqCwKWuGzGo4ncfzJfaYESh-W0Q2xQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20240905023624.928b24a4e9c975dd7a774776@dec.sakura.ne.jp> References: <20240904175838.e3afad8936c6c45559af8480@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <CALH631nG7ZUYCdtedrH0f2v6fOoPTbTOw51HGvPxKVE39p=jsQ@mail.gmail.com> <20240905023624.928b24a4e9c975dd7a774776@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 8:36 PM Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> wrote: > > One thing I can think of is that modifying the offending port (this > time, textproc/logseq) to use supported electron (hopefully, the > supported one which upstream is currently struggling to work with) and > mark it as BROKEN, keeping hooked to build. >From my experience, it never works. If the binary distribution was built against Electron XY then we need to provide the port with the same XY version. Sometimes even mismatching patch version (the third number) causes a crash. I never dug into the crash, though.Maybe it is easily fixable, but it requires building Electron WITH_DEBUG=yes, which is, well, very resource consuming.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALH631=9XEQbgMSJ%2Bd6YfqCwKWuGzGo4ncfzJfaYESh-W0Q2xQ>