Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 15:00:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SysctlFS Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10007141457550.59294-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200007142145.PAA39245@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20000714124805.F17372@ywing.creative.net.au> Adrian Chadd writes: > : As I said in my previous email, persistence isn't the primary problem > : in my eyes. There are many ways people can handle it. What I see as being > : an interesting problem is handling devfs across multiple process/group > : namespaces (jail/chroot) without cluttering up your mount table. > > Yes. Another issue is the new hot plug devices. It is highly > desirable to allow arbitrary commands to run when they come and go. > I have some solutions for both problems.. At least for the devfs in jail problems.. in particular a variant on a symbolic link which is interpretted as a symlink into /dev this would allow many /devs to exist without many mounted filesystems in each jail > Warner > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10007141457550.59294-100000>