Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 09:56:49 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: pjchilds@imforei.apana.org.au (Peter Childs) Cc: scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org, pjchilds@imforei.apana.org.au, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/1316 Message-ID: <199610230756.JAA24542@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199610230530.PAA04077@al.imforei.apana.org.au> from Peter Childs at "Oct 23, 96 03:00:45 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Peter Childs wrote: > > This problem is supposedly fixed in 2.2-CURRENT, and looking at > > the code, the function OpenTunnel() seems to have had the initial > > 15 or so lines rewritten, but nothing that looks like a "structural" > > change. > > Please do. Jordan asked me to submit some more patches to 2.15-stable > ppp code based on changes to the 2.2 set, but that was the major > hastle. There is still a problem in route.c I think (from memory), > and thats most of the worst of it. I think some patches regarding > un-free()'d stuff got in to -current lately. The modification is in the diff between rev 1.4 and 1.6 of ppp/os.c (but alas it's not in the CVS log). The diff contains four different hunks, the third one is the one bumping the pty limit from 10 to 256. I think it's safe (and easy) to merge this into 2.1.X, Marc. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610230756.JAA24542>