Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:23:42 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Robert Garrett <rg70@sbcglobal.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release without a lot of the base system Message-ID: <20030327152342.GC29239@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030327151334.GB1597@sbcglobal.net> References: <20030327111440.GJ93053@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030327115428.GF98283@madman.celabo.org> <20030327120633.GN93053@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030327150605.GB29239@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20030327151334.GB1597@sbcglobal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:13:34AM -0600, Robert Garrett wrote: > Not that my opinion matters but shouldn't this point to all the variables > in /etc/defaults/make.conf? as they would all be applicable in this instance? Well yes they are applicable of course, but I thought the distinction was that defaults/make.conf documented all variables having to do with buildworld/installworld, while release(7) documented variables that affected solely the release build process. NOKERBEROS is only used in the release Makefile. --Stijn -- Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+gxd+Y3r/tLQmfWcRAq+oAKCTQXOMw53Ib1EYTzZirrHUk4EVGACgrQKF rUACMDvAaMwp4k667oqgvnc= =5CL2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030327152342.GC29239>