Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 17:43:40 -0700 From: Jamie Norwood <mistwolf@mushhaven.net> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: High Performance NICs Message-ID: <20001002174339.B6585@mushhaven.net> In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001002161513.00ab07b0@mail.Go2France.com> References: <019d01c02c15$f2b72c80$c991f280@mfn.org> <39D8950E.1FA910D2@wmptl.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20001002161513.00ab07b0@mail.Go2France.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On this topic, can anyone recommend a way to force high loads like this, to see how current/prospective hardware fares? Any advice appreciated! Jamie On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 04:19:18PM +0200, Len Conrad wrote: > > > > >I tend to agree with whoever it was that posted the reply to this as > >well, go with the Intel EtherExpress Pro. We've got one on-board (built > >into the Intel 440LX dual PII server board), and it works REALLY well > >under load. I try to use these cards for most applications, but when > >cost is an issue, I tend to go with the 'No-Name' Realtek based cards. > > Is it safe to assume EEPro dual-ethernet server card is supported in > FreeBSD with the standard Intel drvier? I can't find anything > specific to the dual-eth card in the 4.1 release notes. > > Also, what the Intet EEPro Server 'S' card with on-board 3DES IPsec? > > Len > > http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com: ISC BIND 8.2.2 p5 installable binary for NT4 > http://IMGate.MEIway.com: Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001002174339.B6585>