Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:14:39 -0600 From: J Bacher <jb@jbacher.com> To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dsniff 2.3 info: Message-ID: <4.2.2.20001221140608.00b8a2d0@mail.jbacher.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpzohpd0qn.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <J Bacher's message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:40:29 -0600"> <Roger Marquis's message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2000 08:23:37 -0800 (PST)"> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0012210758270.70602-100000@roble.com> <4.2.2.20001221111451.00b6ef00@mail.jbacher.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:37 PM 12/21/00 +0100, you wrote: >J Bacher <jb@jbacher.com> writes: > > > Which translates to "it's FreeBSD's fault". Send patches or shut up. > > So, are you in agreement that this is a FreeBSD issue? > >Not necessarily. I'm saying that what you write translates to laying >the blame at the FreeBSD project's feet. > > > If so, do you expect that anyone that reports a problem with an OS or > > application should also be the individual to provide patches? > >You're not "reporting a problem", you're saying that the problem being >discussed is caused by incompetence or sloppyiness on the part of the >members of the FreeBSD project. Hello? I have not reported a problem, filed a complaint, or engaged in any pissing and moaning. I'm looking for clarification as to your position regarding the disagreement you have with another individual. I saw that a problem was reported. I saw some recommended solutions. The solution that you are disagreement with doesn't resolve the entire issue but it certainly addresses one part of the problem. Is there any logical reason to not take that suggestion into consideration? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20001221140608.00b8a2d0>