Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 23:57:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: Implementing TLS: step 1 Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306192348380.19237-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030620034647.GB2260@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:39:42PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > Q2: Given that libthr has been ported to ia64, what needs to be done > > > to port libkse to ia64 (roughtly)? > > > > libpthread/arch/i386/include/ksd.h: > > libpthread/arch/i386/include/atomic_ops.h > > libpthread/arch/i386/include/pthread_md.h > > libpthread/arch/i386/i386: > > No kernel code? Hmmm, looks like something that's worth giving a I'm not too sure about the kernel code. If you have KSEs working for libthr, then I assume there is very little extra kernel code needed. You do need to have get_mcontext() and set_mcontext() implemented in machdep.c, though. It looks like you do (although nothing is done with clear_ret in get_mcontext()). David, Julian, care to comment? > shot. If we have libkse on ia64, we can more easily work on the > issues related to TLS... -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10306192348380.19237-100000>