Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:04:31 +0100 (CET)
From:      Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de>
To:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, pyunyh@gmail.com
Subject:   Re: bge(4), 5715S, IBM BladeCenter, no carrier
Message-ID:  <201001141604.o0EG4Vx8067123@lurza.secnetix.de>
In-Reply-To: <20100113194647.GO1228@michelle.cdnetworks.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
 > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:28:55AM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
 > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 08:02:10PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
 > > > Hmm.  Interestingly, I don't see any PHY in the verbose dmesg
 > > > output from the 9-current driver.  Maybe I should merge the
 > > > brgphy driver from 9-current to the 8-stable machine, too.
 > > > I'll try that tomorrow.
 > > 
 > > I guess that wouldn't help.

You were right, it didn't help.

 > > If bge(4) think it have to directly handle PHY without using mii(4)
 > > it wouldn't use mii(4) such that you wouldn't see mii(4) related
 > > message.
 > > ATM bge(4) directly handles fiber PHYs under certain conditions as
 > > em(4) does. em(4) does not use mii(4) at all so that wouldn't be
 > > problem on em(4). But bge(4) also uses mii(4) so it only uses
 > > mii(4) under certain cases. I don't like that behavior and would
 > > like to remove that but it would require a lot of code to properly
 > > handle link state changes. I still didn't fully understand the
 > > complexity of link state handling used in driver.
 > > [...]
 > > You said controller has fiber PHY, but brgphy(4) incorrectly
 > > think it has copper PHY. Maybe this is the real problem. I'll see
 > > what can be done.
 > 
 > Would you show me the output of "devinfo -rv | grep brgphy" and
 > "pciconf -lcv" for your bge(4) controller?

Ok, I've got more information.

As a reminder, this is a 8-stable snapshot from December,
with if_bge and brgphy from 9-current as of today.
(In fact I just copied the whole mii directory, not just
brgphy.)

The result is that there is no brgphy found at all, so
devinfo doesn't list it either.

Next thing I did was to apply the patch from PR 122551
because the problem description sounds somewhat similar
to what I have (though not identical).

The result:  Now a brgphy is found, but it lists only
copper media, not 1000baseSX.  I'm pretty sure this is
a fiber PHY, though.  So, still "no carrier".  :-(

Here's the information you requested (with the patch
from PR 122551) ...

devinfo -rv:

   bge0 pnpinfo vendor=0x14e4 device=0x1679 subvendor=0x1014 subdevice=0x0367 class=0x020000 at slot=4 function=0
       Interrupt request lines:
           256
       I/O memory addresses:
           0x97a00000-0x97a0ffff
     miibus0
       brgphy0 pnpinfo oui=0x818 model=0x34 rev=0x0 at phyno=1

pciconf -lcv:

bge0@pci0:22:4:0: class=0x020000 card=0x03671014 chip=0x167914e4 rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00
    vendor     = 'Broadcom Corporation'
    device     = 'NetXtreme 5715S Gigabit Ethernet'
    class      = network
    subclass   = ethernet
    cap 07[40] = PCI-X 64-bit supports 133MHz, 2048 burst read, 1 split transaction
    cap 01[48] = powerspec 2  supports D0 D3  current D0
    cap 03[50] = VPD
    cap 05[58] = MSI supports 8 messages, 64 bit enabled with 1 message

dmesg (verbose boot):

bge0: <Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Fiber Controller, ASIC rev. 0x009003> mem 0x97a00000-0x97a0ffff,0x97a10000-0x97a1ffff irq 24 at device 4.0 on pci22
bge0: Reserved 0x10000 bytes for rid 0x10 type 3 at 0x97a00000
bge0: attempting to allocate 1 MSI vectors (8 supported)
msi: routing MSI IRQ 256 to local APIC 0 vector 56
bge0: using IRQ 256 for MSI
bge0: CHIP ID 0x00009003; ASIC REV 0x09; CHIP REV 0x90; PCI-X
miibus0: <MII bus> on bge0
brgphy0: <BCM5714 10/100/1000baseTX PHY> PHY 1 on miibus0
brgphy0: OUI 0x000818, model 0x0034, rev. 0
brgphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto
bge0: bpf attached
bge0: Ethernet address: 00:21:5e:4c:07:22
bge0: [MPSAFE]
bge0: [ITHREAD]

ifconfig -m:

bge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500
	options=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	capabilities=9b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM>
	ether 00:21:5e:4c:07:22
	inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast xx.xx.xx.255
	media: Ethernet autoselect (none)
	status: no carrier
	supported media:
		media autoselect
		media 1000baseT mediaopt full-duplex
		media 1000baseT
		media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex
		media 100baseTX
		media 10baseT/UTP mediaopt full-duplex
		media 10baseT/UTP
		media none

Actually, the blade (its an IBM BladeCenter HS22) contains
four NICs:  two bge(4) and two bce(4).  All of them are
fiber (1000baseSX).  None of them work.  I can open a new
thread for the bce(4) issue, but first I would prefer to
get the bge(4) interfaces working.

Best regards
   Oliver

-- 
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:  http://www.secnetix.de/bsd

"A language that doesn't have everything is actually easier
to program in than some that do."
        -- Dennis M. Ritchie



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201001141604.o0EG4Vx8067123>