Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 09:50:12 -0600 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: was: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? Message-ID: <39577BB4.4168DF7F@softweyr.com> References: <17253.961705123@localhost> <200006222046.e5MKkKn07168@cwsys.cwsent.com> <20000622235602.A1088@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> <39545167.AE635015@softweyr.com> <20000626025809.G14265@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 12:12:55AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote:
> > Yes, it is wrong. If it must be linked with GNU gettext, no matter
> > what their license is, the resulting executable has been infected
> > with the GPL virus.
>
> Binutils and GCC are the same. We just configure them with no NLS
> support and then gettext is not needed.
Then LPRng sans NLS support should not be a problem to import, if it
provides a suitable level of features.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39577BB4.4168DF7F>