Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 13:46:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Scott Ullrich <sullrich@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org> Subject: Re: NAT-T on current 8 Message-ID: <20090531134541.H3234@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <d5992baf0905291456k3078e921t74012d354bd6abc6@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A205679.5030406@zirakzigil.org> <d5992baf0905291456k3078e921t74012d354bd6abc6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Scott Ullrich wrote: Hi Giulio, > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org> wrote: >> As far as I know the natt patch hasn't been included in the source tree yet. >> This fact notwithstanding, is there a patch I can download and apply >> manually? I need it rather badly... > > There sure is. bz@ sent this over for testing and we are using it in > pfSense.. Works great! > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20090523-04-natt.diff ... Please do > follow up with feedback after you deploy. > > You will most likely also want the latest ipsec-tools cvs port + a few > patches that we are also testing in pfSense... works great! > > http://cvs.pfsense.com/~sullrich/ipsec-tools-devel.zip ... This is a > port file of a recent ipsec-tools cvs checkout + a few patches > provided by vanhu@, extract to /usr/ports/security/ and make install. > > The NATT patch is slated to hit the FreeBSD tree soon so please do > report back your findings. Yes, in case you find any positiv or negative things we'd be happy to hear back from you - or anyone else who's going to give it a try. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090531134541.H3234>