Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 12:46:43 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> To: John Hay <jhay@meraka.org.za> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: MK_ARM_EABI to retire in current Message-ID: <20140521194643.GH43976@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140521192807.GA48338@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> References: <C66667D9-2F5E-44E0-AF04-E9DFE70BAF5A@gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonSHCyD-8jpK0EPkctVwpJ%2BPu4dfBkvATdOS3yrN4ttVg@mail.gmail.com> <20140521192807.GA48338@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Hay wrote this message on Wed, May 21, 2014 at 21:28 +0200: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:50:21AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > isn't eabi on the xscale still broken? > > It might still be broken. But there are more brokenness than that. :-( > By defining WITHOUT_ARM_EABI=yes in src.conf, I can get an AVILA kernel > built that boots with src from head at around mid December. Latest 10 > and head just give no output, with or without WITHOUT_ARM_EABI defined. Did you apply the patch I referenced in: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140219172938.GH34851@funkthat.com that was sent to you? This should fix 10, and HEAD should be fine unless there has been a regression in the last few months... I haven't worked on the AVILA since no one is interested in helping me... > > On 19 May 2014 08:40, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > MK_ARM_EABI is going to die in current. It is the default for all platforms currently. I???m eliminating it as a build option. It must die because it invisibly (to uname) effects the ABI. > > > > > > So, to that end, I see two options: > > > > > > (1) Retire and remove oabi support. > > > (2) Retain oabi support, but change its name to armo and armoeb. > > > > > > The rough consensus of arm developers I???ve polled now, and in the past, is that we just let oabi support die now that EABI support is working for everybody. > > > > > > Before I pull the trigger on this, however, I must ask if anybody has a problem with my doing option (1), and if so, what keeps you using oabi. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140521194643.GH43976>