Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 07:54:04 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel && poudriere jails Message-ID: <20151228065404.GA1620@c720-r285885-amd64> In-Reply-To: <5680A4C4.6030303@freebsd.org> References: <20151227174815.GA1783@c720-r285885-amd64> <5680A4C4.6030303@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El día Monday, December 28, 2015 a las 10:56:04AM +0800, Julian Elischer escribió: Julian, Thanks for your feedback; ... > On 28/12/2015 1:48 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have on a Dell M5500 my poudriere jails for amd64; the host system btw: it is a M4400, not M5500; > > is at the moment r276659 (January 2015) and the jails are: > > > > r276659 (January 2015) + ports r392920 (July 2015) > > r276659 (January 2015) + ports r403255 (December 2015) > > > > I'm right now updating the host to r292778 (as of today) and will run > > new jails: > > > > r285885 (August 2015) + ports r403255 (December 2015) > > r292778 (December 2015) + ports xxxxxxx (January 2016) > > > > My question is: will the two old jails based on r276659 still work on a > > host r292778? > > My experience is that you are more likely to have problems in your > existing setup because you should always try keep the kernel newer > than the newest jail. but in the actual case the kernel of the host equals the jails; and it worked/works fine; > your new stup shoud just work. > ok; so I will continue with the update; thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151228065404.GA1620>