Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 09:57:42 +0000 From: Antony T Curtis <antony.t.curtis@ntlworld.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The case for FreeBSD Message-ID: <1107856662.84971.10.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> In-Reply-To: <20050207214652.0ccf31a2.diegocglinux@yahoo.es> References: <4205F382.8020404@freebsd.org> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1050206132109.55669F-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20050206194857.5920e369.diegocglinux@yahoo.es> <1107754103.4206fc77b1e68@imp4-q.free.fr> <20050207214652.0ccf31a2.diegocglinux@yahoo.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 21:46 +0100, Diego Calleja wrote: > > Advertising works, but only if there is a sound product behind it. > > Advertising works regardless of the product, and windows is the best proof of this > > And lack of advertising can kill a product, regardless of the quality of the > product (ie: digital) Bad advertising can kill a product quickly, especially when the adverts confuse prospective users... Remember the IBM's "Nuns" OS/2 commercial? -- Antony T Curtis, BSc. UNIX, Linux, *BSD, Networking antony.t.curtis@ntlworld.com C++, J2EE, Perl, MySQL, Apache +44-(118)-377-3247 IT Consultancy.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1107856662.84971.10.camel>