Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:29:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Ertl <le@FreeBSD.org> To: Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Q's about IBM TSM (was Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compatheaded for history) Message-ID: <20040628212811.W658@korben.in.tern> In-Reply-To: <20040628192527.1C2755C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> References: <1088385053.18392.3.camel@newton.aipo.gov.au> <20040628192527.1C2755C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Paul Seniura wrote: >> The linux client trips over the whole filesystem overlay thing badly and >> I'm not sure disabling that to run just the TSM client is a good idea. >> (Plus I hate the idea of maintaining custom kernel patches.) > > I've had no luck, likewise, with the Linux TSM client. > I had never considered another compatible client until > seeing your msg just now. I'm using the Linux client with the nullfs hack. Works rather well. At least the Linux client isn't as awful as the ancient SCO client. > IBM says they need more "user base" to even consider a BSD > flavor... go figure... OK, go out and annoy your IBM sales droid. I did. No luck so far, but if they ask for user base, give them some figures. :-) cheers, le -- Lukas Ertl http://homepage.univie.ac.at/l.ertl/ le@FreeBSD.org http://people.freebsd.org/~le/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040628212811.W658>