Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:35:55 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org, perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20031219083555.GB87519@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <3FE2B724.9060902@lonesome.com> References: <200312190805.hBJ85pPL021711@repoman.freebsd.org> <63476156.1071825145@sauron.in.mat.cc> <20031219081604.GH90871@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FE2B724.9060902@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 02:30:28AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> >
> >
> >Maybe it's better to move all p5-* ports which are maintained
> >by ports@FreeBSD.org to perl@FreeBSD.org ?
> >=20
> >
> Please don't do this. In addition to the repo churn, there are many plac=
es
> in the FreeBSD documentation that state that "ports@" is the canonical
> stand-in value for "unmaintained". This would violate POLA IMHO.
I must agree. The other projects, like kde@ and gnome@, have ports
assigned to them because they do maintain them, not unmaintained ports
that are kde or gnome related. I don't think perl@ has the intention to
take over _all_ unmaintained perl related ports :)
--=20
_._ _,-'""`-._
Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk
http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org
-bf- `- \`_`"'-
--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/4rhrqy9aWxUlaZARArzEAJ9yaaZduZFpzzqTxSWhotzUkOrv1QCfS665
7ab7GX893KRw7yEHf+mWMtA=
=ERvL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031219083555.GB87519>