Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:58:02 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rcs is gone? Message-ID: <1E4D92A9-EB10-4469-AA1F-E70D71405732@orthanc.ca> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomQsNWo7ahj_3xveWkU_nzqKeezt76z44qi30ua7pLu-Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <29D748F4-5E38-4587-BC7F-0141234C2F62@orthanc.ca> <F9A84DDF-EC24-42F2-9B34-F5041946293D@orthanc.ca> <EBF54472-4DF9-42AB-9577-B7CEFFFFFA1E@orthanc.ca> <6CEFF9B8-A62A-4616-A0FF-BDDDE1027A7E@FreeBSD.org> <132C8A43-E822-49C3-A1EA-493A40449AD4@orthanc.ca> <AF6F14E9-FBF0-42C6-AE19-3449556E8921@orthanc.ca> <CAJ-Vmo=PrgLWj2TiD8L8g7cx13yzrBYwA8Wt%2B3mVRCRS8f7YXw@mail.gmail.com> <525347DD.5090702@freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmomQsNWo7ahj_3xveWkU_nzqKeezt76z44qi30ua7pLu-Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-10-07, at 4:49 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. Adrian, something to keep in mind is that the majority of your code's = users will never use your preferred communication media. So when you = propose to remove a feature, absence of push-back means nothing, other = than the lack of a communications channel with your 'customers'. We get this a lot with feature manipulation in nmh, and have learned to = tread carefully as a result. This is also why the IETF defines work as being that which takes place = on the mailing lists. Slow and dumb (in the media-rich sense), but = everyone knows what's going on. In that light, if there is a rational argument for pulling RCS out of = the base, propose it here on the -current list and let's all discuss it. --lyndon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1E4D92A9-EB10-4469-AA1F-E70D71405732>