Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:11:52 -0400
From:      "Tim Strike" <tstrike@zaq.com>
To:        <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   IGNORE: Vinum & disklabel - da1 through da3 vs da4s1
Message-ID:  <0802E6A56AA390479CD80AD308CA66343F335F@zaq-msg-02.corp.zaq.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Never mind, this disk apparently was offline when the system was first =
installed by the network folks; a MAKEDEV da4 seems to have solved the =
problem.  Now da4 appears like the remainder of the drives... -ts.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Strike=20
> Sent: September 9, 2002 17:55
> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Vinum & disklabel - da1 through da3 vs da4s1
>=20
>=20
> I'm attempting to setup a vinum volume over four scsi drives=20
> (da1 through da4) -- when I use disklabel to change the type=20
> from 'unused' to ' vinum', the disklabel -e <drive> works=20
> okay for da1, da2 and da3.  When I get to da4, it complains=20
> miserably -- so I tried disklabel -e da4s1 and this contains=20
> what I expect.  Is it normal to change the label'ing after=20
> the 4th disk (da4 would be the 5th disk)?  Any reason for=20
> this inconsistency -- it surely complicates matters for those=20
> unfamiliar with the internals of FBSD.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0802E6A56AA390479CD80AD308CA66343F335F>