Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:37:23 -0800 (PST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Subject: Re: llvm on ia64 ? Message-ID: <397476.56257.qm@web113516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20091216162731.GA39118@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <cmu-lmtpd-27573-1260980788-0@groucho> <20091216162731.GA39118@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0A...=0A> =0A> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04= :26:16PM +0000, giffunip@tutopia.com wrote:=0A> > FWIW;=0A> > =0A> > For mo= st of the scientific/CAD stuff you need a Fortran=0A> > compiler and llvm d= oesn't provide it.=0A> =0A> I understand gcc frontend for llvm gives you fo= rtran.=0A> =0A=0AIt gives you a limited implementation of=A0gfortran42. Rig= ht now It's better and=0Asimpler=A0to build gcc42 (or gcc43) with fortran s= upport.=0A=0Aregards,=0A=0APedro.=A0=0A=0A=0A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?397476.56257.qm>