Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 18:38:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> To: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com, rivers@dignus.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE pccard? Message-ID: <200010032238.SAA82910@lakes.dignus.com> In-Reply-To: <14810.23511.559509.678184@hip186.ch.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [ On Tuesday, October 3, Thomas David Rivers wrote: ] > > Just to add to this thread a little. > > > > I put the card in a 3.4-RELEASE machine (which works.) It seems to > > acquire a different MAC address than the 4.1.1 code does. > > > > In 3.4 PAO I get: > > > > Card inserted, slot 0 > > card0: assign ed0 iobase 0x300 irq 9 flags 0x30000 > > ed0: address 00:10:60:38:3b:b7, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > > I 4.1(.1) I get: > > > > ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f ir1 3 slot 1 on pccard1 > > ed1: address 01:02:00:ff:15:1d, type NE2000 (16 bit) > > > > When you do this in 4.1.1, do you already have an 'ed0' device in your > machine? The PAO example shows 'ed0' as the device while 4.1.1 shows ed1. I'm > currently having problems with any 4.1.1 kernel probing my two ed cards > incorrectly (I get ed1 but not ed0), I just haven't had time to debug > it. Hopefully tonight I can back out the if_ed.c file to the last RELENG_4 > commit and see if that fixes my problem. > > Just wondering if there was another card in your machine which would make this > PCcard NE2000 become ed1 rather than ed0. > > -Jr > Nope - there actually wasn't - but the kernel is configured for one (which is why, I believe, the pccard code chose #1 instead of #0.) - Dave Rivers - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010032238.SAA82910>