Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:25:20 +0100 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Gavin Atkinson <gavin@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r215295 - head/sys/opencrypto Message-ID: <20101114232520.GB57077@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011142312010.23661@ury.york.ac.uk> References: <201011141309.oAED9Xcv082719@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1011142312010.23661@ury.york.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:13:24PM +0000, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Sun, 14 Nov 2010, Marius Strobl wrote: > > Author: marius > > Date: Sun Nov 14 13:09:32 2010 > > New Revision: 215295 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215295 > > > > Log: > > Let cryptosoft(4) add its pseudo-device with a specific unit number and its > > probe method return BUS_PROBE_NOWILDCARD so it doesn't get attached to real > > devices hanging off of nexus(4) with no specific devclass set. Actually, the > > more desirable fix for this would be to get rid of the newbus interface of > > cryptosoft(4) altogether but apparently crypto(9) was written with support > > for cryptographic hardware in mind so that approach would require some KPI > > breaking changes which don't seem worth it. > > I'm guessing this fixes kern/132129 and kern/136123? > Likely, I haven't seen the failure mode described in these PRs though. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101114232520.GB57077>