Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:29:42 -0700 From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: large ufs2 partitions and 'df' Message-ID: <200305121929.h4CJTgTh037927@beastie.mckusick.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 May 2003 21:04:23 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305112102450.4662-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 21:04:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: large ufs2 partitions and 'df' X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match Before we go all gung hoon this, is this structure described in any standard? (posix?) Posix does not define statfs. If it did, it would only go so far as to give a list of the minimally required fields. I expect that X/Open does define statfs, but I do not have a copy of their standard. The BSD statfs comes from the statfs first defined by Sun Microsystems, and includes all the (original) field names. Of course, it also has additional stuff like the names of the device from which the filesystem is mounted and the name of the mount point. Kirk McKusick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305121929.h4CJTgTh037927>