Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:57:44 -0600 From: Scott Stahl <sstahl@gmail.com> To: Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com> Cc: stephane martin <stephane.martin@m4x.org> Subject: Re: Apache 1.3.x vs 2.0.x Message-ID: <14197f4204091710576dfd602f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1095435393.23198.6.camel@localhost> References: <20040917131814.1B93616A4CE@hub.freebsd.org> <200409171726.07317.stephane.martin@m4x.org> <1095435393.23198.6.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 09:36:33 -0600, Paul Querna <chip@force-elite.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 17:26 +0200, stephane martin wrote: > > It is probably the same problem with mod_python and mod_perl. > > No, mod_python uses a Global Interpreter Lock, and is therefore thread > safe. Performance is better for mod_python under the Prefork MPM > because of this however. > > mod_perl has thread safety built in, and performs *much* better under > the Worker MPM. Thanks. I think I will stay with my current install as there doesn't seem to be any benefits in upgrading. Scott.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14197f4204091710576dfd602f>