Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 10:00:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Nielsen" <nielsen@memberwebs.com> To: <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ipnat and bimapping Message-ID: <20020509170045.5584B37B414@hub.freebsd.org> References: <3CDA988D.34E2148C@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Works for me. The two ranges also don't overlap. In my experience, however, even if they do ipnat is smart enough to handle certain overlapping subnets properly. I think last rule wins. ----- Original Message ----- > Would bimap'ing the 24.24.24.1/32 address to 10.10.20.2/32 work? Or would that > screw up my nat'ing of the 10.10.10.0/24 net? I need all ports NOT nat'ed to > 10.10.10.0/24 to go to 10.10.20.2/32. Am I asking for trouble on the protected > net, or is this safe? Is bimap the right thing to use? > > How big is the gun that I am about to use to shoot myself in the foot? > > Eric To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020509170045.5584B37B414>