Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 22:04:17 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Conclusion to nfsiod/lkm problem... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.951222220227.15923A-100000@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <199512230253.NAA04398@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Dec 1995, Bruce Evans wrote: > > After my last posting, where at the very bottom I questioned > >my CFLAGS, I went into make.conf and removed the LDFLAGS=-static > >line I had added in... > > > ...it compiles now. > > > So, the question remains...what is it about lkm that its functions > >can't be statically linked? I'm not 100% certain of what lkm does, from > > Don't know, but LDFLAGS=-static means the same as LDFLAGS='-s tatic'. > -s says to strip the object and the arg `tatic' is ignored. Perhaps you > meant -Bstatic. > Ack...ya, that's what I meant...thanks... Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting scrappy@hub.org | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge, soon to be: | | Information and scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://hub.org | Communications, Inc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.951222220227.15923A-100000>